anonymous
2009-04-15 04:01:27 UTC
Now the question might seem absurd, but I argue that surely nothing is impossible.
What I want to know is whether science can totally disprove the notion of flying, whether it is dismissed purely through logic or if some scientists do indeed note that that it could happen.
I mean throughout history ideas have been dubbed ridiculous, but we know are now or can be possible.
Time travel for example seems a ludicrously profound and an unfathomable concept; but we now know it could happen.
People use to think the world was flat, and if you proposed Darwin's theory on evolution 1500 years ago you would receive one almighty slap.
And by that logic, doesn't that mean there is no such thing as an axiom, and that we can't discount anything.
Or are we at such a developed stage in humanity that if it was possible, even a tiny bit, we would know by now?
And flying is thought by most as being impossible, and perhaps for now it is, but maybe there is a way, or maybe our minds can't calculate such depths and wrap our heads around the dynamics of the possibility. Maybe...
Or am I just a whimsical crack pot?