Don't listen to HarperDL, please.
You've hit upon a fantastically important question, by the way. There is no obvious reason why "gravitational mass" should be the same as "inertial mass", but it appears that they ARE the same.
By "gravitational mass" I mean the force that gravity exerts on a given mass (given by, for example, F = m*g, where "g" is the strength of the gravitational field wherever the mass "m" is sitting). Notice that if you double the mass here, the force doubles; if you triple the mass, the force triples, and so on.
By "inertial mass" I mean the mass which tells you how the object is going to accelerate for a given force, and this is given by Newton's 2nd Law: a = F/m. Here, "a" is the acceleration of the object, "m" is the mass, and "F" is the force that's doing the accelerating.
If you say that F = m*a, and that F = m*g, then m*a = m*g, and the mass cancels out. For gravity, no matter what mass you're dealing with, the acceleration will be the same "g" for a given situation!
This is NOT an obvious result, and you've asked a very good question. People are still trying to figure out if gravitational and inertial masses are always exactly the same; so far, it appears that they are.