Question:
What matter in the original atom bomb is converted to energy?
CSB
2012-07-17 09:21:49 UTC
What matter in the original atom bomb is converted to energy?
Four answers:
Samantha
2012-07-17 09:26:14 UTC
If you take a proton or something and make it go really, really fast & give it lots of kinetic energy then relativity says it gets heavier. In the same way if you’ve got lots of potential energy if you put it into a really big heavy atom like uranium then it will also get heavier. When you split up that big atom you get less potential energy and that means that the resultants (all of the protons and all of the neutrons inside) are lighter than they were before because they have less potential energy.



So there are actually the same number of constituents, but the sum total weight is decreased.
oldprof
2012-07-17 16:33:34 UTC
U235 in one (Little Boy...Hiroshima) and Pu240 (Fat Man...Nagasaki) in the other.



Both the uranium and plutonium are radioactive heavy metals whose atoms are relatively easy to split...fission. Only a very tiny percentage (less than 1%) of each metal is actually converted into energy.



The Little Boy was a simple design, which is still classified because it is so simple that terrorists could easily build one if they got the U235. The Fat Boy was not so simple; in fact they were unsure it would actually explode. It did, in fact with a bit more poop than the Little Boy.
anonymous
2012-07-17 16:42:53 UTC
Uranium
robbi
2012-07-17 16:34:02 UTC
In physics, mass–energy equivalence is the concept that the mass of a body is a measure of its energy content. In this concept, mass is a property of all energy, and energy is a property of all mass, and the two properties are connected by a constant. This means (for example) that the total internal energy E of a body at rest is equal to the product of its rest mass m and a suitable conversion factor to transform from units of mass to units of energy. Albert Einstein proposed mass–energy equivalence in 1905 in one of his Annus Mirabilis papers entitled "Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy-content?"



E is energy, m is mass, and c is the speed of light in a vacuum. The formula is dimensionally consistent and does not depend on any specific system of measurement units. The equation E = mc2 indicates that energy always exhibits relativistic mass in whatever form the energy takes.[2] Mass–energy equivalence does not imply that mass may be "converted" to energy, but it allows for matter to be converted to energy. Through all such conversions, mass remains conserved, since it is a property of matter and any type of energy. In physics, mass must be differentiated from matter. Matter, when seen as certain types of particles, can be created and destroyed (as in particle annihilation or creation), but the system of precursors and products of such reactions, as a whole, retain both the original mass and energy, with each of these system properties remaining unchanged (conserved) throughout the process. Simplified, this means that the total amount of energy (E) before the experiment is equal to the amount of energy after the experiment. Letting the m in E = mc2 stand for a quantity of "matter" (rather than mass) may lead to incorrect results, depending on which of several varying definitions of "matter" are chosen.

When energy is removed from a system (for example in nuclear fission or nuclear fusion), mass is always removed along with the energy. This energy retains the missing mass, which will in turn be added to any other system which absorbs it. In this situation E = mc2 can be used to calculate how much mass goes along with the removed energy. It also tells how much mass will be added to any system which later absorbs this energy.

E = mc2 has sometimes been used as an explanation for the origin of energy in nuclear processes, but mass–energy equivalence does not explain the origin of such energies. Instead, this relationship merely indicates that the large amounts of energy released in such reactions may exhibit enough mass that the mass-loss may be measured, when the released energy (and its mass) have been removed from the system. For example, the loss of mass to atoms and neutrons as a result of the capture of a neutron, and loss of a gamma ray, has been used to test mass-energy equivalence to high precision, as the energy of the gamma ray may be compared with the mass defect after capture. In 2005, these were found to agree to 0.0004%, the most precise test of the equivalence of mass and energy to date. This test was performed in the World Year of Physics 2005, a centennial celebration of Einstein's achievements in 1905.[3]

Einstein was not the first to propose a mass–energy relationship (see the History section). However, Einstein was the first scientist to propose the E = mc2 formula and the first to interpret mass–energy equivalence as a fundamental principle that follows from the relativistic symmetries of space and time.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...