Question:
What does light look like?
M-GX
2010-12-21 08:42:43 UTC
Can someone please give me a credible scientific answer to the following conundrum:

As you know our brains are encased within the skull completely cut off from the external world - i.e. it sits in total darkness. We 'see' light through our eyes. However our brains don't actually 'see' what our eyes see - they see the electrical impulses sent from our eyes meaning our brains have to interpret that message and if that interpretation is wrong say in the case of 'light' how can we be sure that we are seeing it as our eyes are seeing it.
Seven answers:
OldPilot
2010-12-21 08:53:44 UTC
Our brains interpet based on experience. Effect is what is important. It does not really matter what a rose looks like. What is important is that we think it is pretty, smells good, and the thorns will hurt if we grab it wrong



That you think the light is on and because it is on you can see other things in your room is what is important



Reality enforces it's will. It does not matter what you think is true. Think something that is false and physical law will correct your error. You can think you can fly, jump off a tall building and you find out very fast if that belief is correct
jcherry_99
2010-12-21 09:38:34 UTC
Here are some random thoughts on this.

1. There is a difference between the Macro and the Micro world. A block of ice at the macro level looks a whole lot different than at the micro level. The forces dominant in one are not the same at each level. What is important at one level is not so important in the other. Our unaided eyes see things at the macro level and very valid laws are derived from the way we see things. Newton's laws are verified at this level and are obedient without exception (that I can think of) at this level. At the molecular level, Newton's laws require some modification, especially at great velocities. Photons are micro level actors. We don't exactly see them. We use their properties and transform them according to the way we have been constructed.



2. This video asks us to be astonished at energy transformation ( I only watched the first one). The macro world sees this all the time. Burning a Yule log (Merry Christmas by the way), transforms matter into heat, into different forms of matter, into light, into sound, into motion (when sap crackles and spits out of the fire). We are not astonished by that particularly, but we should recognize that it is a kind of reality that we are constructed to see, feel and hear. Yet the chemistry is astonishing and is no less so that it takes place on the macro level as on the micro.



Edit

====

I watched the second and the third in the series. Of the second I would say that if I were deeply religious, I'd be a bit offended. The soul's power goes much beyond making perception out of the media that we think causes reality. It is a huge jump and one that I'm not particularly comfortable in making.



The third one gets no comment from me other than to say the Kabbalah is much beyond study at a cursory level and that's all I have.
oldprof
2010-12-21 10:32:45 UTC
This is a good question.



Our brains begin to form interutero and continue to develop physically through ages four to six. As we are exposed to our sensory environment, our brains form circuits of synapses and neurons to interpret what we sense. This happens for all five senses: hearing, feeling, seeing, smelling, and tasting. The receptors from all these senses are connected through our nervous system to the brain. So the brain is hardly isolated; it is in communication with the outside all the time. If it's healthy that is.



Through evolution, the brains of mankind are predisposed to interpret some things pretty much the same way. Color is one of those things. Photons of given energy levels excite the cones in the eye, which send appropriate signals to the brain where they are interpreted as given colors. This doesn't always work that way; thus some have color blindness, and certainly what's red for some people is magenta for others. So the interpretation is not uniformly consisted across beings.



Images are not as predisposed in our genetic codes; so we learn them as we grow up from birth on. And to a point, we, our brains, can be fooled by so-called optical illusions. But in the early years our brains learn to interpret images using all five senses. Watch a baby, for example, as it is predisposed to shove everything it can get its tiny little hand on into its mouth. It is correllating what it sees with what it tastes, which helps to form a more complete image of the object.



There are brain afflictions that scramble images from what most would interpret them to be. Dyslexia is one such issue. Here, a reader will see a drow backwards, for example from how it is actually written on a page. And that looks perfectly normal to the dyslexic except for the fact, over the years, he or she has learned to interpret it as "word" like normal people. As I said, interpreting images is a learned trait.



Although there is much yet to be learned on how the brain works, we are getting better and better tools for studying that. We can actually trace the electro-chemical brain patterns within a functioning brain, to see what's working and what's not for given senses and bio functions like talkiing, thinking, etc. We can even trace the emotions like hate and love.



With the advent of stem cells research, we are also learning how and why some cells grow into muscle, some into nerves, and so on. And that will help us understand how the brain forms over the formative years.



There is a saying, "God is the the gaps." The gaps are the gaps in our understanding of nature and the natural order of things. So some people tend to invoke some sort of divine intervention wherever science and engineering can't explain something. But the gaps in science and engineering are getting smaller every day. We, mankind, are able to explain more of the why and how of things by invoking science, not some sort of god, every day.
?
2010-12-21 08:45:01 UTC
Light doesn't look like anything. It it's a form of energy that travels in waves and energy, by definition, has no mass or volume
Lydia Sahni
2010-12-21 08:57:02 UTC
Light doesn't look like anything. It it's a form of energy that travels in waves and energy, by definition, has no mass or volume
rob
2010-12-21 09:11:15 UTC
very good ques. it shows ur imagination power and ur curosity. But its not really important what stuff really is, whats more important is that how u intepret it to be. totalle agree with the third anwer above.
2010-12-21 08:44:25 UTC
That's a really dumb question. It would be like asking "How do you spell the letter M".


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...