Question:
How doe's a spacecraft propel itself, when there's nothing in space to push against?
Captain Eyewash
2006-06-26 04:40:32 UTC
How doe's a spacecraft propel itself, when there's nothing in space to push against?
Nineteen answers:
anonymous
2006-06-26 04:52:40 UTC
Mass transfer.



The mechanism is one by Newton, not Einstein, and it is Newton's 3rd law.



This mechanism is the whole action-reaction thing and applied to the rocket is simply; as the fuel is burned and exhaust expelled the expulsion of the exhaust mass is what propels the rocket in the opposite direction.
Pearlsawme
2006-06-26 11:59:57 UTC
Inside the rocket there is a gas chamber. Gas is burnt inside the chamber.



If there is no outlet, the pressure will be enormous so as to break the chamber and all parts of the chamber will be made to pieces which will fly of in all directions.



However, we are not allowing the chamber to explode. There is an outlet for the gas to come out of the chamber. The enormous pressure of the gas pushes the gas outside the chamber (rocket).



If there WERE NO OPENING, the pressure acts in both the front and back of the rocket equally. The rocket cannot move. (Of course, in all directions the pressure acts equally; but we consider the pressure acting along the direction of the opening alone)

Now since there is an opening at the back, there is an unbalanced force which acts on the rocket in the forward direction alone. Hence the rocket is pushed forward.



In terms of Newton’s third law, we can say that the rocket pushes the gas outside and hence the gas pushes the rocket forward.
2006-06-26 11:52:09 UTC
A spacecraft propels itself not by "pushing against something" but by creating a force called thrust in the direction that it needs to travel in.



This done by expelling the right amount of gasses (ie: the resulting hot gasses from the combustion of the spacecraft's fuel) in the opposite direction. Newton's 3rd law of gravity states that for every action there is an equal but opposite reaction.



It's the same effect as when you let go of a balloon and the air comes out of it, the action of the air being expelled from the balloon creates a reaction in the balloon travelling in the opposite direction.



This effect does not need anything to "push against".
CurlyQ
2006-06-26 15:51:18 UTC
From Newton's 'Laws of Motion', "To every force there is an equal and opposite reaction".



Stand on solid ground and push against a brick wall. Your shoulders may move back but you feet will remain stationary because of the frictional force.



Repeat the experiment while on ice skates on a skating rink and you will move backwards. The frictional force between your feet and the rink is much smaller than on solid ground.



Explode rocket fuel in a chamber with but one open exit. The force of the exploding gases imparts a forward thrust on the rocket equal to the explosive force produced by the rapid combustion of the fuel. There is no force in front of the rocket to resist its forward motion.



Watch a jet plane and see the vapour trail left behind. The plane flies at high altitude to reduce the frictional force of the air preventing its forward motion.



Finally, push down on a helical spring with your maximum effort.

Hold that position as long as you can then lift your hand. The spring returns to its original length and you will have a mark on your hand, even a bruise. The more force you place on the spring the more resistance it will offer. See first paragraph.
sudiptocool
2006-06-26 11:54:41 UTC
You do not need to push against some thing to move forward. What every body else is confusing with is the frictional force.

Newtons third law of motion said that for every action there is equal and opposite reaction. The force produced by the emitted burned gases off the rocket shell provides it the forward momentum.

How ever there is no need for the rocket to fire on endlesly. The rocket trajecory is chosen out before lanching so that the rocket may use the gravitational pulls of the universal objects like planets and sun's foces to move foward in a tangential trajectory.
wireflight
2006-06-26 12:25:18 UTC
if the spacecraft exists, there is something in space to push against: the spacecraft.



rockets are "reaction engines." Ek (kinetic energy) = ((1/2)mv^2), where m= the mass of the ejectorate (products of combustion) and v= the speed at which the ejectorate is expelled. The force pressing against the ejectorate is applied not only to the ejectorate, but also (through the motor) to the spacecraft.



there's some good info at Wikipedia, too; you might want to start with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specific_impulse or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsiolkovsky_rocket_equation and do further research from there.



Spacecraft also "propel themselves" by partnering with celestial bodies (commonly: "the slingshot effect")
thenerd
2006-06-26 11:57:13 UTC
oh my god!The first answer changed the science upside down!!!lol!it is not the einstein theory it was the newtons thrid law that stated "action has a equal and opposite reaction."And coming to your question yes there is nothing in the space to push against,but do you ever thought of satellites revolving round the earth with out any force?Why becoz to escape from the earth`s gravity the object should have an escape velocity to escape from the influence of earth`s gravity.Since the spacecraft will raise above from the ground with a thrust force against the ground and gradually raise to overcome the gravity of earth it will attain the escape velocity and when it comes fully out from the earth boundary since there is no space it could not propel itself but we know it still as the velocity and acceleration with which it overcame the gravity of earth(escape velocity).got it?So due to there is no external force existing in the space and according to the newton`s first law"a body will continously in the state of rest or uniform acceleration when there is no external force".So there is no force on the craft acting to reduce its velocity.Therefore it will continue with the same acceleration in space and it doesn`t need any propelsion.I hope you understood.
Munster
2006-06-26 11:49:13 UTC
There is something. It's the spacecraft itself. When the fuel mixture burns it expands in all directions so it is pushing the spacecraft forward at the same time the gasses are escaping out the rear of the exit nozzle.
genghis41f
2006-06-26 11:47:40 UTC
It uses small manoevring rockets to move, using Newton's third law(... Not Einstein's) Every acton has an equal and opposite reaction. The rocket blast is directed in a chosen direction. this pushes the spacecraft in the opposite direction, just as the guy above described with the rowing boat and machine gun.
anonymous
2006-06-26 12:17:57 UTC
The space craft is a specially designed machine used by astronomers to travel in space.The combustor present in the rear engine combusts the fuel(nascent hydrogen+nascent oxygen) and the hot gases ejecting push the space craft forwards .The reason is that due to the newtons third law of motion:- there is always an equal and opposite reaction to every action.
Abhi
2006-06-26 11:46:05 UTC
i hav always wondered the same...how can a spacecraft propel it self in space...n as sum1 said above me dat a boat can be propelled by firing a bullet form a gun..idats true but not in space ...cauz ders nothin to push against..in case of a boat as ders atmosphere....u can surely get an opposite action..but in space i don think so....basically dese spacecrafts move in orbits...as dey are out of earths atmosphere..dey hav nothin to propel against..dey move bout in orbit..

hmm i think i m wrong:P....

i hav no idea

but yea think over it

i hope i m da best answerer:P



lol
BackMan
2006-06-26 11:42:59 UTC
Einsteins theory " every action has an equal and opposite reaction" eg You can propell a rowing boat by firing a machine gun off the back of it.
leowin1948
2006-06-26 12:15:29 UTC
It does not push any thing.It works on the law"Every action has an equal and opposite reaction".The engine create huge pressure backward ,leaves huge gas backward and space craft moves in opposite direction,ie forward.with equal pressure or speed.
anonymous
2006-06-26 16:15:59 UTC
When the fuel ignites and is pushed out into space, the opposite reaction pushes the ship forward.



Ship<- explosion ->flames
binita
2006-06-26 11:49:45 UTC
it works on newton's 3rd law.the space craft gushes the fuel out which in turn pushes the space craft.
100% Chance of Pain
2006-06-26 11:43:54 UTC
Gravity and Speed.
Moggy
2006-06-26 12:17:25 UTC
against the gas it forces out basically.
englands.glory
2006-06-26 11:52:25 UTC
This should keep you going for 10 mins or so:



One of the most amazing endeavors man has ever undertaken is the exploration of space. A big part of the amazement is the complexity. Space exploration is complicated because there are so many problems to solve and obstacles to overcome. You have things like:

The vacuum of space

Heat management problems

The difficulty of re-entry

Orbital mechanics

Micrometeorites and space debris

Cosmic and solar radiation

The logistics of having restroom facilities in a weightless environment

But the biggest problem of all is harnessing enough energy simply to get a spaceship off the ground. That is where rocket engines come in.



Rocket engines are, on the one hand, so simple that you can build and fly your own model rockets very inexpensively (see the links on the last page of the article for details). On the other hand, rocket engines (and their fuel systems) are so complicated that only three countries have actually ever put people in orbit. In this article, we will look at rocket engines to understand how they work, as well as to understand some of the complexity surrounding them.



The Basics

When most people think about motors or engines, they think about rotation. For example, a reciprocating gasoline engine in a car produces rotational energy to drive the wheels. An electric motor produces rotational energy to drive a fan or spin a disk. A steam engine is used to do the same thing, as is a steam turbine and most gas turbines.

Rocket engines are fundamentally different. Rocket engines are reaction engines. The basic principle driving a rocket engine is the famous Newtonian principle that "to every action there is an equal and opposite reaction." A rocket engine is throwing mass in one direction and benefiting from the reaction that occurs in the other direction as a result.









This concept of "throwing mass and benefiting from the reaction" can be hard to grasp at first, because that does not seem to be what is happening. Rocket engines seem to be about flames and noise and pressure, not "throwing things." Let's look at a few examples to get a better picture of reality:



If you have ever shot a shotgun, especially a big 12-gauge shot gun, then you know that it has a lot of "kick." That is, when you shoot the gun it "kicks" your shoulder back with a great deal of force. That kick is a reaction. A shotgun is shooting about an ounce of metal in one direction at about 700 miles per hour, and your shoulder gets hit with the reaction. If you were wearing roller skates or standing on a skateboard when you shot the gun, then the gun would be acting like a rocket engine and you would react by rolling in the opposite direction.



If you have ever seen a big fire hose spraying water, you may have noticed that it takes a lot of strength to hold the hose (sometimes you will see two or three firefighters holding the hose). The hose is acting like a rocket engine. The hose is throwing water in one direction, and the firefighters are using their strength and weight to counteract the reaction. If they were to let go of the hose, it would thrash around with tremendous force. If the firefighters were all standing on skateboards, the hose would propel them backwards at great speed!



When you blow up a balloon and let it go so that it flies all over the room before running out of air, you have created a rocket engine. In this case, what is being thrown is the air molecules inside the balloon. Many people believe that air molecules don't weigh anything, but they do (see the page on helium to get a better picture of the weight of air). When you throw them out the nozzle of a balloon, the rest of the balloon reacts in the opposite direction.

On the next page, we'll look at a detailed example to get a better understanding of the concepts at work here.





Photo courtesy NASA

A remote camera captures a close-up view of a Space Shuttle Main Engine during a test firing at the John C. Stennis Space Center in Hancock County, Mississippi.







A rocket engine is generally throwing mass in the form of a high-pressure gas. The engine throws the mass of gas out in one direction in order to get a reaction in the opposite direction. The mass comes from the weight of the fuel that the rocket engine burns. The burning process accelerates the mass of fuel so that it comes out of the rocket nozzle at high speed. The fact that the fuel turns from a solid or liquid into a gas when it burns does not change its mass. If you burn a pound of rocket fuel, a pound of exhaust comes out the nozzle in the form of a high-temperature, high-velocity gas. The form changes, but the mass does not. The burning process accelerates the mass.



Let's learn more about thrust.



Thrust

The "strength" of a rocket engine is called its thrust. Thrust is measured in "pounds of thrust" in the U.S. and in Newtons under the metric system (4.45 Newtons of thrust equals 1 pound of thrust). A pound of thrust is the amount of thrust it would take to keep a 1-pound object stationary against the force of gravity on Earth. So on Earth, the acceleration of gravity is 32 feet per second per second (21 mph per second). If you were floating in space with a bag of baseballs and you threw one baseball per second away from you at 21 mph, your baseballs would be generating the equivalent of 1 pound of thrust. If you were to throw the baseballs instead at 42 mph, then you would be generating 2 pounds of thrust. If you throw them at 2,100 mph (perhaps by shooting them out of some sort of baseball gun), then you are generating 100 pounds of thrust, and so on.

One of the funny problems rockets have is that the objects that the engine wants to throw actually weigh something, and the rocket has to carry that weight around. So let's say that you want to generate 100 pounds of thrust for an hour by throwing one baseball every second at a speed of 2,100 mph. That means that you have to start with 3,600 one pound baseballs (there are 3,600 seconds in an hour), or 3,600 pounds of baseballs. Since you only weigh 100 pounds in your spacesuit, you can see that the weight of your "fuel" dwarfs the weight of the payload (you). In fact, the fuel weights 36 times more than the payload. And that is very common. That is why you have to have a huge rocket to get a tiny person into space right now -- you have to carry a lot of fuel.



Thrust Example: Space Shuttle



You can see the weight equation very clearly on the Space Shuttle. If you have ever seen the Space Shuttle launch, you know that there are three parts:

The Orbiter

The big external tank

The two solid rocket boosters (SRBs)

The Orbiter weighs 165,000 pounds empty. The external tank weighs 78,100 pounds empty. The two solid rocket boosters weigh 185,000 pounds empty each. But then you have to load in the fuel. Each SRB holds 1.1 million pounds of fuel. The external tank holds 143,000 gallons of liquid oxygen (1,359,000 pounds) and 383,000 gallons of liquid hydrogen (226,000 pounds). The whole vehicle -- shuttle, external tank, solid rocket booster casings and all the fuel -- has a total weight of 4.4 million pounds at launch. 4.4 million pounds to get 165,000 pounds in orbit is a pretty big difference! To be fair, the orbiter can also carry a 65,000 pound payload (up to 15 x 60 feet in size), but it is still a big difference. The fuel weighs almost 20 times more than the Orbiter.

[Reference: The Space Shuttle Operator's Manual]



All of that fuel is being thrown out the back of the Space Shuttle at a speed of perhaps 6,000 mph (typical rocket exhaust velocities for chemical rockets range between 5,000 and 10,000 mph). The SRBs burn for about two minutes and generate about 3.3 million pounds of thrust each at launch (2.65 million pounds average over the burn). The three main engines (which use the fuel in the external tank) burn for about eight minutes, generating 375,000 pounds of thrust each during the burn.



Solid-Fuel Rockets: Fuel Mixture

Solid-fuel rocket engines were the first engines created by man. They were invented hundreds of years ago in China and have been used widely since then. The line about "the rocket's red glare" in the National Anthem (written in the early 1800's) is talking about small military solid-fuel rockets used to deliver bombs or incendiary devices. So you can see that rockets have been in use quite awhile.

The idea behind a simple solid-fuel rocket is straightforward. What you want to do is create something that burns very quickly but does not explode. As you are probably aware, gunpowder explodes. Gunpowder is made up 75% nitrate, 15% carbon and 10% sulfur. In a rocket engine you don't want an explosion -- you would like the power released more evenly over a period of time. Therefore you might change the mix to 72% nitrate, 24% carbon and 4% sulfur. In this case, instead of gunpowder, you get a simple rocket fuel. This sort of mix will burn very rapidly, but it does not explode if loaded properly. Here's a typical cross section:





A solid-fuel rocket immediately before and after ignition





On the left you see the rocket before ignition. The solid fuel is shown in green. It is cylindrical, with a tube drilled down the middle. When you light the fuel, it burns along the wall of the tube. As it burns, it burns outward toward the casing until all the fuel has burned. In a small model rocket engine or in a tiny bottle rocket the burn might last a second or less. In a Space Shuttle SRB containing over a million pounds of fuel, the burn lasts about two minutes.



Solid-Fuel Rockets: Channel Configuration

When you read about advanced solid-fuel rockets like the Shuttle's solid rocket boosters, you often read things like:

The propellant mixture in each SRB motor consists of an ammonium perchlorate (oxidizer, 69.6 percent by weight), aluminum (fuel, 16 percent), iron oxide (a catalyst, 0.4 percent), a polymer (a binder that holds the mixture together, 12.04 percent), and an epoxy curing agent (1.96 percent). The propellant is an 11-point star-shaped perforation in the forward motor segment and a double- truncated- cone perforation in each of the aft segments and aft closure. This configuration provides high thrust at ignition and then reduces the thrust by approximately a third 50 seconds after lift-off to prevent overstressing the vehicle during maximum dynamic pressure.

This paragraph discusses not only the fuel mixture but also the configuration of the channel drilled in the center of the fuel. An "11-point star-shaped perforation" might look like this:







The idea is to increase the surface area of the channel, thereby increasing the burn area and therefore the thrust. As the fuel burns the shape evens out into a circle. In the case of the SRBs, it gives the engine high initial thrust and lower thrust in the middle of the flight.



Solid-fuel rocket engines have three important advantages:



Simplicity

Low cost

Safety

They also have two disadvantages:

Thrust cannot be controlled.

Once ignited, the engine cannot be stopped or restarted.

The disadvantages mean that solid-fuel rockets are useful for short-lifetime tasks (like missiles), or for booster systems. When you need to be able to control the engine, you must use a liquid propellant system.



Liquid-Propellant Rockets

In 1926, Robert Goddard tested the first liquid-propellant rocket engine. His engine used gasoline and liquid oxygen. He also worked on and solved a number of fundamental problems in rocket engine design, including pumping mechanisms, cooling strategies and steering arrangements. These problems are what make liquid-propellant rockets so complicated.



Photo courtesy NASA

Dr. Robert H. Goddard and his liquid oxygen-gasoline rocket in the frame from which it was fired on March 16, 1926, at Auburn, Mass. It flew for only 2.5 seconds, climbed 41 feet, and landed 184 feet away in a cabbage patch.







The basic idea is simple. In most liquid-propellant rocket engines, a fuel and an oxidizer (for example, gasoline and liquid oxygen) are pumped into a combustion chamber. There they burn to create a high-pressure and high-velocity stream of hot gases. These gases flow through a nozzle that accelerates them further (5,000 to 10,000 mph exit velocities being typical), and then they leave the engine. The following highly simplified diagram shows you the basic components.









This diagram does not show the actual complexities of a typical engine (see some of the links at the bottom of the page for good images and descriptions of real engines). For example, it is normal for either the fuel of the oxidizer to be a cold liquefied gas like liquid hydrogen or liquid oxygen. One of the big problems in a liquid propellant rocket engine is cooling the combustion chamber and nozzle, so the cryogenic liquids are first circulated around the super-heated parts to cool them. The pumps have to generate extremely high pressures in order to overcome the pressure that the burning fuel creates in the combustion chamber. The main engines in the Space Shuttle actually use two pumping stages and burn fuel to drive the second stage pumps. All of this pumping and cooling makes a typical liquid propellant engine look more like a plumbing project gone haywire than anything else -- look at the engines on this page to see what I mean.



All kinds of fuel combinations get used in liquid propellant rocket engines. For example:



Liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen - used in the Space Shuttle main engines

Gasoline and liquid oxygen - used in Goddard's early rockets

Kerosene and liquid oxygen - used on the first stage of the large Saturn V boosters in the Apollo program

Alcohol and liquid oxygen - used in the German V2 rockets

Nitrogen tetroxide/monomethyl hydrazine - used in the Cassini engines



Other Possibilities

We are accustomed to seeing chemical rocket engines that burn their fuel to generate thrust. There are many other ways to generate thrust however. Any system that throws mass would do. If you could figure out a way to accelerate baseballs to extremely high speeds, you would have a viable rocket engine. The only problem with such an approach would be the baseball "exhaust" (high-speed baseballs at that...) left streaming through space. This small problem causes rocket engine designers to favor gases for the exhaust product.

Many rocket engines are very small. For example, attitude thrusters on satellites don't need to produce much thrust. One common engine design found on satellites uses no "fuel" at all -- pressurized nitrogen thrusters simply blow nitrogen gas from a tank through a nozzle. Thrusters like these kept Skylab in orbit, and are also used on the shuttle's manned maneuvering system.



New engine designs are trying to find ways to accelerate ions or atomic particles to extremely high speeds to create thrust more efficiently. NASA's Deep Space-1 spacecraft will be the first to use ion engines for propulsion. See this page for additional discussion of plasma and ion engines.





Photo courtesy NASA

This image of a xenon ion engine, photographed through a port of the vacuum chamber where it was being tested at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, shows the faint blue glow of charged atoms being emitted from the engine. The ion propulsion engine is the first non-chemical propulsion to be used as the primary means of propelling a spacecraft.



Main > Science > Space



How Rocket Engines Work



by Marshall Brain







Table of Contents

Introduction to How Rocket Engines Work The Basics The Space Baseball Scenario Thrust Thrust Example: Space Shuttle Solid-Fuel Rockets: Fuel Mixture Solid-Fuel Rockets: Channel Configuration Liquid-Propellant Rockets Other Possibilities Lots More Information Shop or Compare Prices















Lots More Information

Related HowStuffWorks Articles



How Space Shuttles Work

Can you make a rocket engine using hydrogen peroxide and silver?

How Fusion Propulsion Will Work

How Air-Breathing Rockets Will Work

How Electromagnetic Propulsion Will Work

How Personal Jetpacks Will Work

More Great Links



General Rocket Links



Rocketry Online

The Basics of Space Flight - huge, in-depth material

Rocket Equations - good set of equations for model rocket flight

Propulsion: Cassini engine

Ion Rockets

Propulsion efficiency of an engine - equations

Water rocket links

The Artemis Project - to land on the moon!

Model Rocketry



Irving Rocketry

National Association of Rocketry

Build Your Own Rocket Engines

How to Design, Build and Test Small Liquid-Fuel Rocket Engines

NASA: Beginner's Guide to Model Rockets

Space Shuttle Engines

Solid Rocket Boosters

Space Shuttle Main Propulsion System

Space Shuttle Main Engines - another description and image

Orbital Propulsion System

Nasa Shuttle page

Commercial Rocket Engines

Boeing RS-68 engine

HMX

The Power of Apollo

Pratt & Whitney

USAF Museum Rocket Engine Gallery
Jeff J
2006-06-26 11:47:17 UTC
Rocket

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

For other uses, see Rocket (disambiguation).



A Redstone rocket, part of the Mercury programThe traditional definition of a rocket is a vehicle, missile or aircraft which obtains thrust by the reaction to the ejection of fast moving exhaust gas from within a rocket engine. Often the term is also used to refer to a rocket engine.



Contents [hide]

1 Overview

2 History

2.1 Origins of rocketry

2.2 Modern rocketry

3 Net thrust

4 Regulation

5 Accidents

6 Future

7 See also

8 External links







[edit]

Overview

The origin of rockets dates back over 2,000 years ago when people of the Han Dynasty in china (c.206 BC–220 AD) began experimenting with gunpowder and fireworks. The explosive force of such pyrotechnics were eventually adapted for use in propelling projectiles such as cannon and musket balls. While such projectiles do not contain their own fuel, the same principles that propel our modern conception of rockets were behind these advanced (for their time) weapons of war. The use of gunpowder to propel projectiles is precursor to the development of the first solid rockets.



In military use, rockets generally use solid propellant and are unguided. Rockets equipped with warheads (representing a form of missile) can be fired by ground-attack aircraft at fixed targets such as buildings, or can be launched by ground forces at other ground targets. During the Vietnam era, there were also air-launched unguided rockets that carried a nuclear payload designed to attack aircraft formations in flight. In military terminology, the word missile is often preferred over rocket when the weapon uses either solid or liquid propellant, and has a guidance system. (This distinction generally does not apply to civilian or orbital launch vehicles.)



In all rockets, the exhaust is formed from propellant which is carried within the rocket prior to its release. Rocket thrust is due to accelerating the exhaust gases (see Newton's 3rd Law of Motion).



There are many different types of rockets, and a comprehensive list can be found in spacecraft propulsion- they range in size from tiny models that can be purchased at a hobby store, to the enormous Saturn V used for the Apollo program.



Rockets are used to accelerate, change orbits, de-orbit for landing, for the whole landing if there is no atmosphere (e.g. for landing on the Moon), and sometimes to soften a parachute landing immediately before touchdown (see Soyuz spacecraft).



Most current rockets are chemically powered rockets (internal combustion engines). A chemical rocket engine can use solid propellant (see Space Shuttle's SRBs), liquid propellant (see Space shuttle main engine), or a hybrid mixture of both. A chemical reaction is initiated between the fuel and the oxidizer in the combustion chamber, and the resultant hot gases accelerate out of a nozzle (or nozzles) at the rearward facing end of the rocket. The acceleration of these gases through the engine exerts force ('thrust') on the combustion chamber and nozzle, propelling the vehicle (in accordance with Newton's Third Law). See rocket engine for details.



Not all rockets use chemical reactions. Steam rockets, for example, release superheated water through a nozzle where it instantly flashes to high velocity steam, propelling the rocket. The efficiency of steam as a rocket propellant is relatively low, but it is simple and reasonably safe, and the propellant is cheap and widely available. Most steam rockets have been used for propelling land-based vehicles but a small steam rocket was tested in 2004 on board the UK-DMC satellite. There are proposals to use steam rockets for interplanetary transport using either nuclear or solar heating as the power source to vaporize water collected from around the solar system.



Rockets where the heat is supplied from other than the propellant, such as steam rockets, are classed as external combustion engines. Other examples of external combustion rocket engines include most designs for nuclear powered rocket engines. Use of hydrogen as the propellant for external combustion engines gives very high velocities.



Due to their high exhaust velocity (mach ~10+), rockets are particularly useful when very high speeds are required, such as orbital speed (mach 25). The speeds that a rocket vehicle can reach can be calculated by the rocket equation; which gives the speed difference ('delta-v') in terms of the exhaust speed and ratio of initial mass to final mass ('mass ratio').



Rockets must be used when there is no other substance (land, water, or air) or force (gravity, magnetism, light) that a vehicle may employ for propulsion, such as in space. In these circumstances, it is necessary to carry all the propellant to be used.



Common mass ratios for vehicles are 20/1 for dense propellants such as liquid oxygen and kerosene, 25/1 for dense monopropellants such as hydrogen peroxide, and 10/1 for liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen. However, mass ratio is highly dependent on many factors such as the type of engine the vehicle uses and structural safety margins.



Often, the required velocity (delta-v) for a mission is unattainable by any single rocket because the propellant, structure, guidance and engines weigh so much as to prevent the mass ratio from being high enough. This problem is frequently solved by staging - the rocket sheds excess weight (usually tankage and engines) during launch to reduce its weight and effectively increase its mass ratio.



Typically, the acceleration of a rocket increases with time (even if the thrust stays the same) as the weight of the rocket decreases as fuel is burned. Discontinuities in acceleration will occur when stages burn out, often starting at a lower acceleration with each new stage firing.



[edit]

History

[edit]

Origins of rocketry

The ancient Chinese invention of gunpowder by Taoist chemists, and their use of it in various forms of weapons: (fire arrows), bombs, and cannons, resulted in the development of the rocket. They were initially developed for religious proceedings that were related to the worship and celebration of the Chinese Gods in the ancient Chinese religion. They were the precursors to modern fireworks, and after extensive research, were adapted for use as artillery in warfare during the 10th century to 12th century. Some of the ancient Chinese rockets were stationed at the military fortification known as the Great Wall of China, and employed by the elite soldiers stationed there. Rocket technology first became known to Europeans following their use by the Mongols Genghis Khan and Ogodei Khan when they conquered Russia, Eastern Europe, and parts of Central Europe(i.e. Austria). The Mongolians had stolen the Chinese technology by conquest of the northern part of China and also by the subsequent employment of Chinese rocketry experts as mercenaries for the Mongol military. Additionally, the spread of rockets into Europe was also influenced by the Ottomans at the siege of Constantinople in 1453. Although it is very likely that the Ottomans themselves were influenced by the Mongol invasions of the previous few centuries. Nevertheless, for several more centuries rockets remained misunderstood curiosities to those in the West.



For over two centuries, the work of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth nobleman Kazimierz Siemienowicz, "Artis Magnae Artilleriae pars prima" ("Great Art of Artillery, the First Part". also known as "The Complete Art of Artillery"), was used in Europe as a basic artillery manual. The book provided the standard designs for creating rockets, fireballs, and other pyrotechnic devices. It contained a large chapter on caliber, construction, production and properties of rockets (for both military and civil purposes), including multi-stage rockets, batteries of rockets, and rockets with delta wing stabilizers (instead of the common guiding rods).



At the end of the 18th century, iron-cased rockets were successfully used militarily in India against the British by Tipu Sultan of the Kingdom of Mysore during the Anglo-Mysore Wars. The British then took an active interest in the technology and developed it further during the 19th century. The major figure in the field at this time was William Congreve. From there, the use of military rockets spread throughout Europe. At the Battle of Baltimore in 1814, the rockets fired on Fort McHenry by the rocket vessel HMS Erebus were the source of the rockets' red glare described by Francis Scott Key in The Star-Spangled Banner.



Early rockets were very inaccurate. Without the use of spinning or any gimballing of the thrust, they had a strong tendency to veer sharply off course. The early British Congreve rockets reduced this somewhat by attaching a long stick to the end of a rocket (similar to modern bottle rockets) to make it harder for the rocket to change course. The largest of the Congreve rockets was the 32 pound (14.5 kg) Carcass, which had a 15 foot (4.6 m) stick. Originally, sticks were mounted on the side, but this was later changed to mounting in the center of the rocket, reducing drag and enabling the rocket to be more accurately fired from a segment of pipe.





Robert Goddard and his first liquid-fueled rocketThe accuracy problem was mostly solved in 1844 when William Hale modified the rocket design so that thrust was slightly vectored to cause the rocket to spin along its axis of travel like a bullet. The Hale rocket removed the need for a rocket stick, travelled further due to reduced air resistance, and was far more accurate.



[edit]

Modern rocketry

In 1903, high school mathematics teacher Konstantin Tsiolkovsky (1857-1935) published Исследование мировых пространств реактивными приборами (The Exploration of Cosmic Space by Means of Reaction Devices), the first serious scientific work on space travel. The Tsiolkovsky rocket equation—the principle that governs rocket propulsion—is named in his honor. His work was essentially unknown outside the Soviet Union, where it inspired further research, experimentation, and the formation of the Cosmonautics Society. His work was republished in the 1920s in response to Russian interest in the work of Robert Goddard. Among other ideas, Tsiolkovsky accurately proposed to use liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen as a nearly optimal propellant pair and determined that building staged and clustered rockets to increase the overall mass efficiency would dramatically increase range.



Early rockets were grossly inefficient because of the heat energy that was wasted in the exhaust gases. Modern rockets were born when, after receiving a grant in 1917 from the Smithsonian Institution, Robert Goddard attached a supersonic (de Laval) nozzle to a rocket engine's combustion chamber. These nozzles turn the hot gas from the combustion chamber into a cooler, hypersonic, highly directed jet of gas; more than doubling the thrust and enormously raising the efficiency.



In 1923, Hermann Oberth (1894-1989) published Die Rakete zu den Planetenräumen ("The Rocket into Planetary Space"), a version of his doctoral thesis, after the University of Munich rejected it. This book is often credited as the first serious scientific work on the topic that received international attention.



During 1920s, a number of rocket research organizations appeared in America, Austria, Britain, Czechoslovakia, France, Italy, Germany, and Russia. In the mid-1920s, German scientists had begun experimenting with rockets which used liquid propellants capable of reaching relatively high altitudes and distances. A team of amateur rocket engineers had formed the Verein für Raumschiffahrt (German Rocket Society, or VfR) in 1927, and in 1931 launched a liquid propellant rocket (using oxygen and gasoline).



From 1931 to 1937, the most extensive scientific work on rocket engine design occurred in Leningrad, at the Gas Dynamics Laboratory. Well funded and staffed, over 100 experimental engines were built under the direction of Valentin Glushko. The work included regenerative cooling, hypergolic ignition, and fuel injector designs that included swirling and bi-propellant mixing injectors. However, the work was curtailed by Glushko's arrest during Stalinist purges in 1938. Similar but much less extensive work was also done by the Austrian professor Eugen Sänger.



In 1932, the Reichswehr (which in 1935 became the Wehrmacht) began to take an interest in rocketry. Artillery restrictions imposed by the Treaty of Versailles limited Germany's access to long distance weaponry. Seeing the possibility of using rockets as long-range artillery fire, the Wehrmacht initially funded the VfR team, but seeing that their focus was strictly scientific, created its own research team, with Hermann Oberth as a senior member. At the behest of military leaders, Wernher von Braun, at the time a young aspiring rocket scientist, joined the military (followed by two former VfR members) and developed long-range weapons for use in World War II by Nazi Germany, notably the A-series of rockets, which led to the infamous V-2 rocket (initially called A4).



In 1943, production of the V-2 rocket began. The V-2 represented the biggest step forward in rocketry ever. The V-2 had an operational range of 300 km (185 miles) and carried a 1000 kg (2204 lb) warhead, with an amatol explosive charge. The vehicle was only different in details from most modern rockets, with turbopumps, inertial guidance and many other features. Thousands were fired at various Allied nations, mainly England, as well as Belgium and France. While they could not be intercepted, their guidance system design and single conventional warhead meant that the V-2 was insufficiently accurate against military targets. 2,754 people in England were killed, and 6,523 were wounded before the launch campaign was terminated. While the V-2 did not significantly affect the course of the war, it provided a lethal demonstration of the potential for guided rockets as weapons.



At the end of World War II, competing Russian, British, and U.S. military and scientific crews raced to capture technology and trained personnel from the German rocket program at Peenemünde. Russia and Britain had some success, but the United States benefited most. The US captured a large number of German rocket scientists (many of whom were members of the Nazi Party, including von Braun) and brought them to the United States as part of Operation Paperclip. There the same rockets that were designed to rain down on Britain were used instead by scientists as research vehicles for developing the new technology further. The V-2 evolved into the American Redstone rocket, used in the early space program.



After the war, rockets were used to study high-altitude conditions, by radio telemetry of temperature and pressure of the atmosphere, detection of cosmic rays, and further research. This continued in the U.S. under von Braun and the others, who were destined to become part of the U.S. scientific complex.



Independently, research continued in the Soviet Union under the leadership of Sergei Korolev. With the help of German technicians, the V-2 was duplicated and improved as the R-1, R-2 and R-5 missiles. German designs were abandoned in the late 1940s, and the foreign workers were sent home. A new series of engines built by Glushko and based on inventions of Aleksei Isaev formed the basis of the first ICBM, the R-7. The R-7 launched the first satellite, the first man into space and the first lunar and planetary probes, and is still in use today. These events attracted the attention of top politicians, along with more money for further research.



Rockets became extremely military important in the form of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) when it was realised that nuclear weapons carried on a rocket vehicle were essentially not defensible against once launched, and they became the delivery platform of choice for these weapons.



Fuelled partly by the Cold War, the 1960s became the decade of rapid development of rocket technology in the Soviet Union (Vostok, Soyuz, Proton) and in the United States (e.g. X-20 Dyna-Soar, Gemini), including research in other countries, such as Britain, Japan, Australia, etc. Culminating at the end of the 60s with the manned landing on the moon via the Saturn V.



Rockets remain a popular military weapon. The use of large battlefield rockets of the V-2 type has given way to guided missiles, but rockets are often used by helicopters and light aircraft for ground attack, being more powerful than machine guns, but without the recoil of a heavy cannon. In the 1950s there was a brief vogue for air-to-air rockets, including the formidable AIR-2 'Genie' nuclear rocket, but by the early 1960s these had largely been abandoned in favor of air-to-air missiles.



However in the heart of many of the public, the most important use of rockets is manned spaceflight. Vehicles such as Soyuz for orbital tourism and Spaceship One for suborbital tourism show the way towards greater commercialisation of rocketry, away from government funding, and towards more widespread access to space.



[edit]

Net thrust

Below is an approximate equation for calculating the Gross Thrust of a rocket:







where:



exhaust gas mass flow



jet velocity at nozzle exit plane



flow area at nozzle exit plane



static pressure at nozzle exit plane



ambient (or atmospheric) pressure





Since, unlike a jet engine, a conventional rocket motor lacks an air intake, there is no Ram Drag to deduct from the Gross Thrust. Consequently the Net Thrust of a rocket motor is equal the Gross Thrust.



The term represents the momentum thrust, which remains constant at a given throttle setting, whereas the term represents the pressure thrust term. At full throttle, the net thrust of a rocket motor improves slightly with increasing altitude, because the reducing atmospheric pressure increases the pressure thrust term.



It is however very usual to rearrange the above equation slightly:







Where: the effective exhaust velocity in a vacuum of that particular engine.



[edit]

Regulation

Under international law, the nationality of the owner of a launch vehicle determines which country is responsible for any damages resulting from that vehicle. Due to this, some countries require that rocket manufacturers and launchers adhere to specific regulations to indemnify and protect the safety of people and property that may be affected by a flight.



In the US any rocket launch that is not classified as amateur, and also is not "for and by the government," must be approved by the Federal Aviation Administration's Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA/AST), located in Washington, DC.



[edit]

Accidents

Because of the enormous chemical energy in all useful rocket fuels (greater weight to power ratio than in explosives), accidents can and have happened. The number of people injured or killed is usually small because of the great care typically taken, but this record is not perfect.



See Space disasters



[edit]

Future

Nuclear thermal rockets have also been developed, but never deployed; they are particularly promising for interplanetary use because of their high efficiency.

Neofuel - Nuclear/solar steam rockets for interplanetary use, using abundant extraterrestrial ice.

Nuclear pulse propulsion rocket concepts give very high thrust and exhaust velocities.

Solar thermal rockets use solar radiation to heat a propellant.

Another class of rocket-like thrusters in increasingly common use are ion drives, which use electrical rather than chemical energy to accelerate their reaction mass.



[edit]

See also

List of spaceflights

Timeline of rocket and missile technology

List of rockets

Balloon rocket

Bipropellant rocket

Hybrid rocket

Model rocket

Pulse jet engine

Pulsed Rocket Motors

Rocket engine nozzles

Rocket fuel

Rocket launch

Rocket launch site

Rocket propelled grenade

Rocket sled

Sounding rocket

Skyrocket

Solid rocket

Spacecraft propulsion

Stalin Organ

Tripropellant rocket

Water rocket

Tsiolkovsky rocket equation

Fire Arrow

Shin Ki Chon

[edit]

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to:

rocketGoverning agencies

FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)

National Association of Rocketry

Tripoli Rocketry Association

United Kingdom Rocketry Association

Canadian Association of Rocketry

Hobby Industry Association

Radio Control Hobby Trade Association

Japan Association of Rocketry (site in Japanese)

Indian Space Research Organisation

How Rocket Engines Work

Information sites

several projects of the Scientific Workgroup for Rocketry and Spaceflight (WARR) (german)

Encyclopedia Astronautica - Rocket and Missile Alphabetical Index

Gunter's Space Page - Complete Rocket and Missile Lists


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...