Question:
Why do they say you are 'looking back in time' when you look far into the universe?
romina
2009-08-18 06:14:48 UTC
I have tried to wrap my head around this for years. Are you REALLY looking back in time, as in if it was another earth, you'd see dinosaurs or the middle ages or something? Or is it an 'expression', meaning you are seeing things that happened here billions of years ago, happening elsewhere NOW?
Four answers:
Reyvrex
2009-08-18 06:39:51 UTC
Far distances are measured in lightyears. This distance is that immense extent of space that light has covered when travelling for one year. And speaking of this distances, the edge of the universe, for instance, may be billions of light years away. So, if say, you have a very powerful telescope and you were able to see a planet at the edge of the universe, then it is as if you have seen a view unfolding at a time a billion years ago. That is so because the light that entered your telescope and consequently, your eye, came from that planet billions of years ago yet. For that is the time it took for that light to reach you. And chances are, the source of that light may no longer be there, but the light that has left that source half a billion years ago may still be travelling towards you and will only be seen by people at your place half a billion years from now, in the distant future.



And it might be of interest for you to know that if you could travel at a speed more than that of light, you might run after that light that came from the explosion of the Nuclear Bomb during World War II and you will see the real explosion as it happened in the past. Or better still, overtake the light that came from Earth 100 million years ago, and there you could still see the dinosaurs, for they are still alive until 65 million years ago when they have that mass extinction.
Daniel H
2009-08-18 13:52:53 UTC
Bella, great question! You're obviously reading or listening to some intriguing material and thinking very deeply about it. Here's the scoop...



Let's say that one of our super-high-powered telescopes sees a star "being born" in some distant corner of the universe. The star that is being seen here could actually be very, very old... or, it could even be DEAD! But we're able to see its birth! How is this?



Our observation of the star depends upon LIGHT (whether that's red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, violet LIGHT, x-ray LIGHT, microwave LIGHT, or any other kind of LIGHT). Light takes time to get anywhere. I've heard that we are able to "see" things out to 40 or 50 billion light years away. That means that if a star is (or was) 40 billion light years away, we are NOW seeing the light that it gave off 40 billion years ago. If a planet is that far away, then we are NOW seeing the light that illuminated that planet (and reflected off of it) 40 billion years ago.



Obviously, a lot can happen in 40 billion years. Maybe 30 billion years ago, that star disappeared. If we're just seeing its birth now, then we'll continue to see that star for another 10 billion years. You see, for the next 10 billion years, we'll be collecting the light that the star once gave off.



Does this make sense?



Here's another way to think about it: Throw a stone into a pond. How do you know that the stone hit the water? You see it, duh. But what if we couldn't "see" it? You could stick your fingers into the calm edge of the pond and wait until you felt the ripples. Just because you feel the ripples doesn't mean that the stone is JUST THEN hitting the surface. Nope, the stone is already long-gone. You're just collecting the PAST information now.



So, we're "seeing into the past," because of the speed of light. Light's fast, but it's not instantaneous. It takes time to get from point A to point B. In the time that it takes to cross the universe, a lot can happen. Stars are born and die. Galaxies are formed. Planets are formed.



Let's say that earth is about 4.6 billion years old. Maybe there's another planet kind of like ours (same age and approximate size). If that planet happened to be 4.6 billion light years away, we could watch its birth even though that all happened a long, long time ago. Even though our planet may have had a very different birth, we could get an idea as to what was happening to other planets at that time in the universe.



Finally, keep in mind that even though we've got this "gift" of seeing into the past, we are very, very blind as to what is happening NOW. Since light is the fastest means of observing things, there is absolutely no way to know what is happening NOW with that star that is/was 40 billion light years away. We're watching its past, but that's all we can do - just watch it unfold gradually before our eyes. Fascinating universe that we've been blessed with, no?
busterwasmycat
2009-08-18 13:23:57 UTC
you do not see here when you look away.



Light takes time to travel, even though it travels very very fast, there are still huge distances involved when looking into space. We only see the light when it arrives here, which means it left where it is coming from some time ago. therefore, what we see is something that happened when the light left where it is coming from, and the further we look away, the longer ago we see.
?
2009-08-18 13:37:47 UTC
well ur right its only a feeling that u feel u think of the things that have occured before and u look in the sky and close ur eyes just to feel the things.



remember one thing ; we all have one time machine our memories which took us back and our dreams which help us to look in the future


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...