Question:
gravitational waves?
Felsen
2008-04-08 02:14:00 UTC
Do gravitational waves spread out in all directions from their point of generation or can they be described as discrete packets like photons?
Eight answers:
2008-04-08 02:38:14 UTC
In physics, the graviton is a hypothetical elementary particle that mediates the force of gravity in the framework of quantum field theory. If it exists, the graviton must be massless (because the gravitational force has unlimited range) and must have a spin of 2 (because gravity is a second-rank tensor field[clarify]).



Gravitons are postulated because of the great success of the quantum field theory (in particular, the Standard Model) at modeling the behavior of all other forces of nature with similar particles: electromagnetism with the photon, the strong interaction with the gluons, and the weak interaction with the W and Z bosons. In this framework, the gravitational interaction is mediated by gravitons, instead of being described in terms of curved spacetime as in general relativity. In the classical limit, both approaches give identical results, including Newton's law of gravitation.[1][2][3]



However, attempts to extend the Standard Model with gravitons run into serious theoretical difficulties at high energies (processes with energies close to or above the Planck scale) because of infinities arising due to quantum effects (in technical terms, gravitation is nonrenormalizable.) Some proposed theories of quantum gravity (in particular, string theory) address this issue. In string theory, gravitons (as well as the other particles) are states of strings rather than point particles, and then the infinities do not appear, while the low-energy behavior can still be approximated by a quantum field theory of point particles. In that case, the description in terms of gravitons serves as a low-energy effective theory.



Contents [hide]

1 Gravitons and models of quantum gravity

2 Experimental observation

3 Is gravity like the other forces?

4 See also

5 References







[edit] Gravitons and models of quantum gravity

When describing graviton interactions, the classical theory (i.e. the tree diagrams) and semiclassical corrections (one-loop diagrams) behave normally, but Feynman diagrams with two (or more) loops lead to ultraviolet divergences; that is, infinite results that cannot be removed because the quantized general relativity is not renormalizable, unlike quantum electrodynamics. In popular terms, the discreteness of quantum theory is not compatible with the smoothness of Einstein's general relativity. These problems, together with some conceptual puzzles, led many physicists to believe that a theory more complete than just general relativity must regulate the behavior near the Planck scale. Superstring theory finally emerged as the most promising solution; it is the only known theory with finite corrections to graviton scattering at all orders.



String theory predicts the existence of gravitons and their well-defined interactions which represents one of its most important triumphs. A graviton in perturbative string theory is a closed string in a very particular low-energy vibrational state. The scattering of gravitons in string theory can also be computed from the correlation functions in conformal field theory, as dictated by the AdS/CFT correspondence, or from Matrix theory.



An interesting feature of gravitons in string theory is that, as closed strings without endpoints, they would not be bound to branes and could move freely between them. If we live on a brane (as hypothesized by some theorists) this "leakage" of gravitons from the brane into higher-dimensional space could explain why gravity is such a weak force, and gravitons from other branes adjacent to our own could provide a potential explanation for dark matter. See brane cosmology for more details.



Some proposed quantum theories of gravity do not predict a graviton.





[edit] Experimental observation

Unambiguous detection of individual gravitons, though not prohibited by any fundamental law, is impossible with any physically reasonable detector.[4] The reason is simply the extremely low cross section for the interaction of gravitons with matter. For example, a detector designed to measure the mass of Jupiter with 100% efficiency, placed in close orbit around a neutron star, would only be expected to observe one graviton every 10 years, even under the most favorable conditions. It would be impossible to discriminate these events from the background of neutrinos, and it would be impossible to shield the neutrinos without the shielding material collapsing into a black hole.[4]



However, experiments to detect gravitational waves, which may be viewed as coherent states of many gravitons, are already underway (e.g. LIGO and VIRGO). Although these experiments cannot detect individual gravitons, they might provide information about certain properties of the graviton. For example, if gravitational waves were observed to propagate slower than c (the speed of light in a vacuum), that would imply that the graviton has mass.[5]





[edit] Is gravity like the other forces?

Some question the analogy which motivates the introduction of the graviton. Unlike the other forces, gravitation plays a special role in general relativity in defining the spacetime in which events take place. Because it does not depend on a particular spacetime background, general relativity is said to be background independent. In contrast, the Standard Model is not background independent. In other words, general relativity and the standard model are incompatible. A theory of quantum gravity is needed in order to reconcile these differences. Whether this theory should itself be background independent, or whether the background independence of general relativity arises as an emergent property is an open question. The answer to this question will determine whether gravity plays a "special role" in this underlying theory similar to its role
champscience
2008-04-08 04:03:50 UTC
Gravitational waves have two important and unique properties. First, there is no need for any type of matter to be present nearby in order for the waves to be generated by a binary system of uncharged black holes, which would emit no electromagnetic radiation. Second, gravitational waves can pass through any intervening matter without being scattered. Whereas light from distant stars may be blocked out by interstellar dust, for example, gravitational waves will pass through unimpeded. These two features allow gravitational waves to carry information about astronomical phenomena never before observed by humans.
Kelvin C
2008-04-08 02:28:07 UTC
Gravitational waves spread out in all directions from their point of generation.



More like sound waves as opposed to like light waves.
2016-10-18 03:41:43 UTC
i'm guessing you prefer to comprehend what occurs whilst Earth have been given hit with one wave. With Einstein's area-time style, the place gravity is in simple terms an area-time airplane bended by using a mass, a wave may be a airplane shifting up and down in harmonic action. perhaps we can be oscillating from the sunlight to the spot the place collision got here approximately. If the gravitational wave is powerful, we would be sucked out of the image voltaic gadget. i'm in simple terms a accepted twelve months uni physics pupil yet it quite is in simple terms what i think of.
roshanxi
2008-04-08 02:17:28 UTC
Gravitational waves spread out in all direction but the intesity is different in different part of the surface depending on the shape.........
2008-04-08 02:58:47 UTC
no no...its not quantum



we do have infinitely small amounts of G.F too.



The spreading out question is weird since a source of gravitational force gives its field in all directions...so it can travel in space...not spread.



I think we still don't have an answer to your spreading question since we don't have anything which gives gravity only in 1 direction
2008-04-08 02:26:58 UTC
Yeah they spread out in all direction b'coz, creating disturbance in the space-time creates ripples just as you disturb a stretched trampoline.
The Alchemyst
2008-04-08 02:24:24 UTC
The book's still open on this one. Theoretically there's a gravity particle called a graviton, but they haven't been able to prove its existence yet.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...